Normal
Several years ago Richard Nixon spoke prophetic words:" where Brazil march, march in Latin America. "He said the president of the United States and in all these countries the sectors linked to the imperial giant swung into action immediately. A to celebrate the compliment and others to narrow or open trade relations with Brazil. Of course much had reasons to do: history has shown the enormous advances in all aspects of the South American country.
President Obama to start his tour in Brazil merely "recognize the growth and influence" of this republic in the other Latin American nations, economic potential and its great natural resources beyond oil and other mineral resources (diamonds, bauxite , coal, copper, natural gas, iron, etc.) well as forestry, cotton, coffee, bananas are the huge water reserves, a factor of disputes, disputes and wars in the future. It is also a country with significant advances in the social area and prepared for their continued production to meet the threats of global hunger. Chile, of course, is an ally valuable to the United States in Latin America where the political map and not favor strategic areas as in the past. It is therefore important to "strengthen in fraternal embrace" the president of the Andean country.
Obama's advisers chosen by the fear of a world war, the horror of reality and the rejection of the lessons of history, true and few decisive voter in a democracy representative of that country to the north, they know that foreign policy can not be, eventually, but a reflection and continuation of the internal. A country supposedly governed with concerns of justice in the life of the national community can not, without dishonor of their dignity or without contradicting himself, to support democracy in Venezuela, the socialist regime of Cuba or the dignity of the peoples of Ecuador and Bolivia. The cynicism of Washington is such that double standards are not allowed to see where is the authentic humanism and solidarity with the lowly. It also condemns the government for alleged Libyan bombing "his people" that are celebrated for their "achievements" in the invasion and massacres caused in Iraq and now Afghanistan.
In this context why include to El Salvador in its rapid tour of our America? We are not a big market for floods in its production, not weigh on the world politically, we have no natural resources or commodities to be subjected to "much deference" and even strategically constitute no point in the geopolitical map to define " major alliances "or serious commitments to industrial and military powers such as China, France, England and the U.S. itself. But deep down there are "other" reasons for the U.S. President's advisers have included us in such a busy schedule.
El Salvador was chosen since the inauguration of Mauricio Funes, such as direct outfall or if you prefer it as representative of American policy for Central America. "He is a true democrat," said Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton, speaking in his first President Funes. "It's a valid interlocutor," he said then. Such predictions did not fall in a vacuum when the coup de etat against President Manuel Zelaya in Honduras, there were a succession of events in which the Salvadoran government played an important role. El Salvador quickly turned away from politics followed by most Latin American and allied with "some guidelines" issued by Washington. The archives and files containing the statements of Foreign Minister Hugo Martinez, the president himself Funes.
condemned the military coup, but that was not relevant, since then the plans were followed properly planned U.S. government. OAS into action as it has always been: a center of intrigue and interest or a "Ministry of Colonies" U.S.. Costa Rica's President Oscar Arias were chosen to "mediate" and find a "solution" quick and satisfactory "certain interests", leaving aside perversely mobile or the reasons for the separation of Zelaya's government and "protect" directly responsible for the coup. At this point, as in the following that led to recognize as legitimate the results of the Honduran elections in which "won" Porfirio Lobo, in proceedings to "make a fresh start" and allow the reinstatement of Honduras to the Secretary of Central American integration, the OAS and other regional bodies, the president of El Salvador was the bearer. It was the role assigned "It was recognizing the progress of Salvadoran democracy," as silly as many analysts suggest this country.
El Salvador has turned its back on Latin America and ideologically it has become next to U.S. interests. With Cuba "is a historical debt paid off," as Funes, opening diplomatic relations, trade and cultural, but that does not bother the imperial colossus of the north, on the contrary seen in "gesture" is an example of "political leadership" are "other" important gestures, such as turning away "from area of \u200b\u200binfluence "of Hugo Chavez or refrain from participating in the Bolivarian Association of the Americas (ALBA) or Petro Caribe make government policy. America needs to build as in the past own zone of influence, countries like Colombia, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Peru, Panama and perhaps Chile, to be obedient and submissive to their demands and strategic policy lines. Brazil is not as willing to interventionist policies, but Obama's visit is to "send a message" to the ALBA countries and particularly the commander Hugo Chávez. There in the middle of a perverse game as the game always puts the giant Imperial.
Issues such as migration, combating drug trafficking, organized crime or investment might be relevant to the rulers of our country, but not so for the United States, as there are major problems that need prompt attention in the Middle East, Japan and other regions. Here we settle for a "new millennium", with certain fees for work "legal" immigrants or grants for infrastructure. That would be enough. A rule change has guarantees submission and have a "legitimate representative" for future political moves.
The disparate analysis support for the "nascent democracy," presidential leadership or recognition to the "ideological independence" with respect to the ALBA, are pure crap or if you prefer lyrics or statements demagogic, as we are perfectly aligned with the imperial policy and the dictates and whims of the ever-present national and international oligarchy. There are gestures or statements of "goodwill" or "good neighbor", as that will solve l and present serious problems as the huge oil bill, the high cost of living, rising crime or the threat of food shortages. If the United States is committed to a policy of solidarity and humanist, should donate substantial funds to solve these problems, refrain from putting pressure or conditions that governments and people to walk with a determined agenda. We all know the measures implemented by the rule when people proclaim their autonomy and independence. Cuba is a permanent example and this mirror do not want to see reflected in other regions.
0 comments:
Post a Comment