Capitalism is guilty of many things. The Burghers defend tooth and nail the system and thus we hear constantly is no need to create wealth to fight poverty, a thesis by other valid, but in practice it imposes exploitation, accumulation and inequality. Greed, lust for power and monetary concentration its sign, its rule, its destination. They study the most diverse economic alternatives to maintain their privileges.
Obviously, there has always been economics, but studying it. Primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism, were and are economic and social systems. Each had and has its traits and characteristics, within the evolutionary process of society. But we insist, the economy as "science" is relatively recent. We could locate at the dawn of capitalism and is developed with the industrial production chain. Marx exactly what set his masterpiece Capital.
If we study and reflect on historical processes, we will see during the seventeenth century and part of the eighteenth, the mercantilist were equivalent wealth in precious metals and postulated that exports should be higher on imports to accumulate gold and silver. The Physiocrats (physiocracy is an economic doctrine that emerged in France in the eighteenth century, as opposed to mercantilism which attributed exclusively to agriculture and land the source of wealth) were in the land value creation. With the industrial revolution really arise theories of economic growth. The emerging middle class demands its historical role. The labor theory of value emerge strong. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth examines the economic system as a whole, ie, as a whole, globally. It seeks the source of value, how to create it. How to grow and reproduce a system. Appear antagonistic positions. David Ricardo versus Malthus, or for example. He soon abandoned the global analysis and passed to the study of prices, savings and business. Forget the search for value and overall balance, is passed to the general and partial.
We are already in the late nineteenth century and the early twentieth century. Monetary theories dominate the landscape. There have been many modifications to the theories of international trade. But the capitalist system suffers periodic crises and depressions. Many theories try to explain. None of them is satisfactory. Between 1929 and 1993 the system was shaken to its foundations. Takes place deeper and more prolonged depression. Four years ago, again the global financial system collapses. Bankrupt big banks and car companies. The strike is brutal, but the bourgeois and oligarchs do not explain the causes, just think about how governments tax these people can "subsidize" their brutal crisis.
Moreover, since 1917 is beginning to develop other social and economic system: socialism. The model of civilization and culture, which excluded from its benefits to most of humanity, as a distinguished Swedish economist said, referring to pre-1913 world, dominated by a group of colonial nations, seemed to disintegrate. Economic science he created it did not help to survive. Over thirty new theories are developed in a desperate attempt to get closer to reality, which is both moved away. It returns to the global analysis, the whole system. To find ways to regrow. Rethinks the problem of growth and economic development. Theories of economic development thus become the "issue of our time."
"The council of wise men" and "world domination economic group" seeking new outlets to the breakdown of the capitalist system, the mercantilist world created to support the privilege. Resources are exhausted miners, gold, silver and oil. It is necessary to destroy "independence" and "revolutionary states." Settle in strategic areas. Building large "schemes" first static and then dynamic. It starts a process of "unbundling" of large models. This is determined increasingly mathematical tools. It is about establishing many relationships between the parts of the whole. To this must be done using more and more hypotheses and assumptions. Again we go away from reality. Initially the economy was political economy. At Over the years he became economy "pure" and in largely on "Econometrics." The hypotheses and assumptions that lie many theories are out of touch. Any resemblance to it is mere coincidence, as we say in colloquial language.
The strategic map has changed, is changing. The serious events in the Middle East are due precisely to the crisis of capitalism, depletion of oil reserves, the need to appropriate the wealth and raw materials, including water. The use of mathematics and applied sciences, is also added military use, the ratio of the arms, with the support of a supposedly legal framework for the effective interference or attacks invasion. At the beginning of 2000 was the pretext of conventional weapons to attack and invade Iraq, the destruction of the Twin Towers and the media campaign with the name of Bin Laden's base and to proceed militarily in Afghanistan and Pakistan. New arguments are used to prepare now military strikes against Libya and Iran.
Without studying in depth the historical process and the actions of the imperialists can never understand the motivations of this around the Arab world, including Libya, Iran, Algeria, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq. The wars in the beginning and end are always economic reasons, financial crises are generated, the need to try and sell the produce innovative military artifacts and magnified. It is urgent to re-read Marx, Value and Capital Hicks English, published in 1939, where he studied the equilibrium and economic fluctuations. The method of reasoning, but blended with other ingredients, the military, of course. When the reasons and the advice emanating from the great centers of world power, do not change their views to governments such as Libya, Iran and Venezuela, arise "other measures" and we all know what they are and where they come from.
Obviously, there has always been economics, but studying it. Primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism, were and are economic and social systems. Each had and has its traits and characteristics, within the evolutionary process of society. But we insist, the economy as "science" is relatively recent. We could locate at the dawn of capitalism and is developed with the industrial production chain. Marx exactly what set his masterpiece Capital.
If we study and reflect on historical processes, we will see during the seventeenth century and part of the eighteenth, the mercantilist were equivalent wealth in precious metals and postulated that exports should be higher on imports to accumulate gold and silver. The Physiocrats (physiocracy is an economic doctrine that emerged in France in the eighteenth century, as opposed to mercantilism which attributed exclusively to agriculture and land the source of wealth) were in the land value creation. With the industrial revolution really arise theories of economic growth. The emerging middle class demands its historical role. The labor theory of value emerge strong. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth examines the economic system as a whole, ie, as a whole, globally. It seeks the source of value, how to create it. How to grow and reproduce a system. Appear antagonistic positions. David Ricardo versus Malthus, or for example. He soon abandoned the global analysis and passed to the study of prices, savings and business. Forget the search for value and overall balance, is passed to the general and partial.
We are already in the late nineteenth century and the early twentieth century. Monetary theories dominate the landscape. There have been many modifications to the theories of international trade. But the capitalist system suffers periodic crises and depressions. Many theories try to explain. None of them is satisfactory. Between 1929 and 1993 the system was shaken to its foundations. Takes place deeper and more prolonged depression. Four years ago, again the global financial system collapses. Bankrupt big banks and car companies. The strike is brutal, but the bourgeois and oligarchs do not explain the causes, just think about how governments tax these people can "subsidize" their brutal crisis.
Moreover, since 1917 is beginning to develop other social and economic system: socialism. The model of civilization and culture, which excluded from its benefits to most of humanity, as a distinguished Swedish economist said, referring to pre-1913 world, dominated by a group of colonial nations, seemed to disintegrate. Economic science he created it did not help to survive. Over thirty new theories are developed in a desperate attempt to get closer to reality, which is both moved away. It returns to the global analysis, the whole system. To find ways to regrow. Rethinks the problem of growth and economic development. Theories of economic development thus become the "issue of our time."
"The council of wise men" and "world domination economic group" seeking new outlets to the breakdown of the capitalist system, the mercantilist world created to support the privilege. Resources are exhausted miners, gold, silver and oil. It is necessary to destroy "independence" and "revolutionary states." Settle in strategic areas. Building large "schemes" first static and then dynamic. It starts a process of "unbundling" of large models. This is determined increasingly mathematical tools. It is about establishing many relationships between the parts of the whole. To this must be done using more and more hypotheses and assumptions. Again we go away from reality. Initially the economy was political economy. At Over the years he became economy "pure" and in largely on "Econometrics." The hypotheses and assumptions that lie many theories are out of touch. Any resemblance to it is mere coincidence, as we say in colloquial language.
The strategic map has changed, is changing. The serious events in the Middle East are due precisely to the crisis of capitalism, depletion of oil reserves, the need to appropriate the wealth and raw materials, including water. The use of mathematics and applied sciences, is also added military use, the ratio of the arms, with the support of a supposedly legal framework for the effective interference or attacks invasion. At the beginning of 2000 was the pretext of conventional weapons to attack and invade Iraq, the destruction of the Twin Towers and the media campaign with the name of Bin Laden's base and to proceed militarily in Afghanistan and Pakistan. New arguments are used to prepare now military strikes against Libya and Iran.
Without studying in depth the historical process and the actions of the imperialists can never understand the motivations of this around the Arab world, including Libya, Iran, Algeria, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq. The wars in the beginning and end are always economic reasons, financial crises are generated, the need to try and sell the produce innovative military artifacts and magnified. It is urgent to re-read Marx, Value and Capital Hicks English, published in 1939, where he studied the equilibrium and economic fluctuations. The method of reasoning, but blended with other ingredients, the military, of course. When the reasons and the advice emanating from the great centers of world power, do not change their views to governments such as Libya, Iran and Venezuela, arise "other measures" and we all know what they are and where they come from.
0 comments:
Post a Comment