Mr. Bolaños
Toni Bolaño is unfortunate in the reason of the current month on 9 February that generates no enthusiasm People in the agreement on pensions by which we must work more and charge less, says this agreement is necessary and positive and gives as evidence that pressure on our debt has been downgraded, it also makes the following statement: "charge least some, but charge all "
sorry to disagree with Mr. Bolaños, it is true that Germany and France have made such cuts and the cuts that are making our government may not order Merkel, but I seems that at least our Chairman suggested and diligently serving suggestions, perhaps to be forgiven so-called "failed" but Spain has characteristics different from those of Germany and France.
Mr. Bolaño, which extend the retirement age, even if they generate enthusiasm, it is logical, because life expectancy also continues happily, but how do you intend to generate enthusiasm which pensions are lower when in Andalusia, for example distract from the common fund of EUR 700 million for early retirement to the family, friends, affiliates and related to the socialist party? 700 million which equals 166.38 116.466 million pesetas, which has to be said in some quarters to realize the magnitude of the operation. Do not think dear reader that the Junta de Andalucia 7 Children governed by Ecija and its president is José María Tempranillo.
Mr. Bolaño, I think it is very difficult to be enthusiastic, or even understand the need to lower pensions for current and future pensioners, when witnessing a blatant and excessive waste by our politicians, especially governors. Why not take away the bonus for Members to work? Do they think that we have chosen to take a nap in parliament? This bonus is in the form of diets Why not privatize or eliminate regional television, which cost us so much money? Why not just once with grants the movies, which are double what they collect at the box office, and that live cejistas your job? And unions Why not just a fucking time with this economic cancer? Why not put a box on the tax return to help unions and anyone who wants to fill in that box? And what about the many NGOs and businesses that serve only to put family and party members? And the embassies of the regional administrations? While the government continues to squander the money of all in ... that you think, its decisions, even when necessary, are not understood and certainly not generate enthusiasm.
Mr. Bolaño, you said that "charge less, certainly, but charge all" does not think so, keep in mind that many will not be quoted by not having a job, others have worked if not will have done enough time and if they charge there must be a pittance, they may have enough to pay the subway ticket that allows them to go to a high Caritas.
Until another day, God willing
0 comments:
Post a Comment