is interesting to hear the speeches and statements by the president of the republic, not only in El Salvador, but many countries world, especially when dark clouds hover over their crowns, since this also come the last monarchs of Europe, Asia and Africa. The examples are obvious and is due to interference by outside interests, but also to the discontent and anger contained for many years by millions of people tired of the corruption, waste and the glitzy life of many of these big shots of international politics.
In any case we would like to refer to terrorism grammar, the careful inquisition of the errors of the delivery of speeches, their hesitation oratorios. As the lack or inadequacy of language is often the babble, the constant eh, eh, eh, or those not so frequent pauses to demonstrate prudence, caution or simple link to the next sentence or phrase, but for lack of resources if you prefer , intellectuals. There are leaders who tend to speak in lengthy paragraphs, lines 20 to 25 breaths without a couple of commas. They are also full of incidental explanatory sentences diluted force without them would be the main thought. Finally, the frequent expressions damaging misuse of prepositions, teaches grammar as such, they "reveal that the regime or relationship to each other have two words or terms."
Indeed, the correlation of number also have their rules of grammar and according to them we must agree that "the frequent misuse of prepositions, grammatically singular agent can not infer a damage plural" terms ", as it seems hint at the verb "harm" is constantly used by politicians. Since then, deputies are the biggest terrorists of language. When you say "I differ with most of the colleagues who have spoken", nobody knows if they wanted to say "I agree with" because it differs "from." Also, when you say the "graduates in schools" comes the question of whether they would not say the "admitted" in schools. It is useless to "... reflect on the human spirit ..." And do not say this phrase: "... I am pleased to receive the strong presence here.
are so many kits that combine many speeches have to do with your point underlined small capitals to highlight the absurdities of every kind committed by the "honorable" members "and the presidents of the other organs of state. But surveillance also has some grammatical analytical claims. Of the crutch presidential leads routinely to initiate multiple calls with endless variations of the verb think ("new and carefully consider the words of Mr. Dabou"), one could infer a psychological characteristic, while for ordinary mortals reflection is a quiet year for our president to talk about is how you think or reflect.
To maintain the line, one could infer that the infinitives of verbs do not ask or accept, simultaneous actions, the opposite of gerunds, which require this, so that the expression "to our president speak is like thought or reflection, perhaps it should become" our president is speaking as one thinks or reflects ". The important thing is that the collection of these reflections grammatical made "flight computer" derived "constant outstanding" the president: "extraordinary loquacity", elementary way of saying, no doubt, that the Chief Executive talks a lot, frontal attack and many times is contradictory in its vehement calls for "unity" so vague for a demagogue to others.
This grammatical shame upon us these reflections, it is no coincidence. It is actually far more severe technical and analytical spirit so ignored and even despised in this country of miracle-working. It is important to notice the procedural and substantive aspects of a presidential work: president's oratorical forms, formalities of the parliamentary game, the daring little ceremonial and diplomatic foreign policy, the semantic mistake the two notions that seem to portray - - or self-portraits - the scheme: dialogue and self-criticism.
An expert in matters of "political grammar" said that "the word self is unhappy about a thousand reasons (...) When a public man propagate the self, only self-criticism, it is inevitable to assume that reserves the exclusive right to criticize their actions and, therefore, be denied that right to others ... " appear also reserve the right to choose the art criticism and the degree of severity or leniency, which used to criticize himself. More unfortunate, if you will, is the word "dialogue" which the dictionary defines as "a conversation between two or more people which in turn express their ideas or feelings." In this case, then it is really a monologue, as the second person necessary dialogue, ie the nation, has no way to express their ideas or feelings as all the usual means to do so fail in our country (El Salvador, so): public demonstrations, political parties, the Legislature , elections, media, television, radio, film. "
And so on to infinity. For example: the analysis of election results in a party system as the Salvadoran is, at best, a colonial tribute paid to Argentina or to American political science, so inclined to discover important trends in the struggles of his public life . The sad thing is that reported embarrassing cases of corruption of senior officials, tax evasion, smuggling and organized crime, but never should the Attorney General's Office or what ever is heard at the public level, is the ringing of the phone to "order" to the instance superior, "forget about those issues" and leave it to posterity. And what about the electoral reforms, only made to ensure the survival of the "minor parties" and avoid falling into the two-party, or a clash of Arena and the FMLN is incurred or a joke or not achieved rules complete fiction that those parties have embodied and sustained with exemplary tenacity.
Finally, analysis of the speeches and actions of the presidents of nations, lends itself to many ideas and conjecture. The important thing in any case are the demands of public opinion and criticism good and bad go beyond the circle of those who govern. It is not absolute power or economic resources and wealth, nothing else should be understood that the president is no longer the only key piece of the political system, its functions have entered a stage of organic mixture with other centers of power - Tell entrepreneurs and financiers to a lesser extent the union bureaucracy. And with those cores, the president is not only in terms of consultation and conciliation, but often, and publicly, of defiance and confrontation. Reality also shows that the Executive is now required to meet demands in a third sector, less localizable and more volatile, but of some importance and is embryonic: public opinion, or rather, the rights of those who have dedicated alone for years to build it with their activity, their independence, their prestige and their critical spirit.
In any case we would like to refer to terrorism grammar, the careful inquisition of the errors of the delivery of speeches, their hesitation oratorios. As the lack or inadequacy of language is often the babble, the constant eh, eh, eh, or those not so frequent pauses to demonstrate prudence, caution or simple link to the next sentence or phrase, but for lack of resources if you prefer , intellectuals. There are leaders who tend to speak in lengthy paragraphs, lines 20 to 25 breaths without a couple of commas. They are also full of incidental explanatory sentences diluted force without them would be the main thought. Finally, the frequent expressions damaging misuse of prepositions, teaches grammar as such, they "reveal that the regime or relationship to each other have two words or terms."
Indeed, the correlation of number also have their rules of grammar and according to them we must agree that "the frequent misuse of prepositions, grammatically singular agent can not infer a damage plural" terms ", as it seems hint at the verb "harm" is constantly used by politicians. Since then, deputies are the biggest terrorists of language. When you say "I differ with most of the colleagues who have spoken", nobody knows if they wanted to say "I agree with" because it differs "from." Also, when you say the "graduates in schools" comes the question of whether they would not say the "admitted" in schools. It is useless to "... reflect on the human spirit ..." And do not say this phrase: "... I am pleased to receive the strong presence here.
are so many kits that combine many speeches have to do with your point underlined small capitals to highlight the absurdities of every kind committed by the "honorable" members "and the presidents of the other organs of state. But surveillance also has some grammatical analytical claims. Of the crutch presidential leads routinely to initiate multiple calls with endless variations of the verb think ("new and carefully consider the words of Mr. Dabou"), one could infer a psychological characteristic, while for ordinary mortals reflection is a quiet year for our president to talk about is how you think or reflect.
To maintain the line, one could infer that the infinitives of verbs do not ask or accept, simultaneous actions, the opposite of gerunds, which require this, so that the expression "to our president speak is like thought or reflection, perhaps it should become" our president is speaking as one thinks or reflects ". The important thing is that the collection of these reflections grammatical made "flight computer" derived "constant outstanding" the president: "extraordinary loquacity", elementary way of saying, no doubt, that the Chief Executive talks a lot, frontal attack and many times is contradictory in its vehement calls for "unity" so vague for a demagogue to others.
This grammatical shame upon us these reflections, it is no coincidence. It is actually far more severe technical and analytical spirit so ignored and even despised in this country of miracle-working. It is important to notice the procedural and substantive aspects of a presidential work: president's oratorical forms, formalities of the parliamentary game, the daring little ceremonial and diplomatic foreign policy, the semantic mistake the two notions that seem to portray - - or self-portraits - the scheme: dialogue and self-criticism.
An expert in matters of "political grammar" said that "the word self is unhappy about a thousand reasons (...) When a public man propagate the self, only self-criticism, it is inevitable to assume that reserves the exclusive right to criticize their actions and, therefore, be denied that right to others ... " appear also reserve the right to choose the art criticism and the degree of severity or leniency, which used to criticize himself. More unfortunate, if you will, is the word "dialogue" which the dictionary defines as "a conversation between two or more people which in turn express their ideas or feelings." In this case, then it is really a monologue, as the second person necessary dialogue, ie the nation, has no way to express their ideas or feelings as all the usual means to do so fail in our country (El Salvador, so): public demonstrations, political parties, the Legislature , elections, media, television, radio, film. "
And so on to infinity. For example: the analysis of election results in a party system as the Salvadoran is, at best, a colonial tribute paid to Argentina or to American political science, so inclined to discover important trends in the struggles of his public life . The sad thing is that reported embarrassing cases of corruption of senior officials, tax evasion, smuggling and organized crime, but never should the Attorney General's Office or what ever is heard at the public level, is the ringing of the phone to "order" to the instance superior, "forget about those issues" and leave it to posterity. And what about the electoral reforms, only made to ensure the survival of the "minor parties" and avoid falling into the two-party, or a clash of Arena and the FMLN is incurred or a joke or not achieved rules complete fiction that those parties have embodied and sustained with exemplary tenacity.
Finally, analysis of the speeches and actions of the presidents of nations, lends itself to many ideas and conjecture. The important thing in any case are the demands of public opinion and criticism good and bad go beyond the circle of those who govern. It is not absolute power or economic resources and wealth, nothing else should be understood that the president is no longer the only key piece of the political system, its functions have entered a stage of organic mixture with other centers of power - Tell entrepreneurs and financiers to a lesser extent the union bureaucracy. And with those cores, the president is not only in terms of consultation and conciliation, but often, and publicly, of defiance and confrontation. Reality also shows that the Executive is now required to meet demands in a third sector, less localizable and more volatile, but of some importance and is embryonic: public opinion, or rather, the rights of those who have dedicated alone for years to build it with their activity, their independence, their prestige and their critical spirit.
0 comments:
Post a Comment